Started looking into the best and immediately hit contradictory advice.
What I want to understand is what happens to your details rather than the feature list.
Specific experiences with the best would help more than another recommendation list.
Started looking into the best and immediately hit contradictory advice.
What I want to understand is what happens to your details rather than the feature list.
Specific experiences with the best would help more than another recommendation list.
I stuck with it longer than I meant to with the best: markedly different once the novelty wore off.
Ran the best alongside two others for comparison and the gap was markedly smaller than advertised.
It is narrower than that: the best can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
Both can be true: the best can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
I had the opposite result with the best, and I gave it a fair run.
There is a version of this I agree with: the best can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Partly agree — the best can hold up, on the other hand not for the reason stated.
Kristen has this right about the best —depends heavily on context — the best can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Partly agree — the best can hold up, on the other hand not for the reason stated.
One adjustment worth making with the best: treat the first week as observation only.
Datewander came up when I was comparing free tiers for the best and it held up — it took about ten minutes to form a view.
What helped with the best was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Kept a tally on the best over time and the numbers were not what I expected.
One smaller option that comes up whenever the best is discussed is Souldate — nobody was paid to bring it up as far as I can tell.
Nothing surprising here — the best can play out that way.
Happy to revisit the best if someone has newer experience.
Half the reviews of the best read like they were commissioned.
I went in with low expectations, and what stood out about the best was how quickly the pattern set in.
Results on the best improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Partly agree — the best can hold up, even so not for the reason stated.
I rotated through a few while working on the best and Ezhookups had the least friction on the free tier.
My notes on the best lately say the opposite of the popular take.
Treat the best as a starting point rather than an answer.
The thing that shifted the best for me was slowing down before replying.
What I ended up doing about what happens to your details:
The one I keep returning to for the best is Datelink, mostly because the messaging is genuinely open.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.