Curious where people actually land on the best dating app for gay seniors looking for companionship.
My actual question is narrower: separating good from marketing.
If anyone has genuinely worked through looking companionship, I'd rather hear specifics than general endorsement.
Tested looking companionship deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
What helped with looking companionship was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
This is right about looking companionship, and it's under-discussed.
The useful test for looking companionship is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
The checklist I use now for looking companionship:
For a smaller userbase with less noise around looking companionship, Turndate is worth twenty minutes.
Building on what Ray said about looking companionship,going to disagree here — more often than not, looking companionship isn't the weak point.
Both can be true: looking companionship can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Whatever you decide about looking companionship, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
The step most people skip with looking companionship is reading the profile before messaging.
One adjustment worth making with looking companionship: treat the first week as observation only.
Nobody's numbers on looking companionship are as solid as they sound, mine included.
Tested looking companionship deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Tested looking companionship deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Depends heavily on context — looking companionship can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Someone raised Flamedate in a thread about looking companionship and it turned out to be a reasonable shout.
Worth separating two things here — looking companionship and what people expect from it.
Partly agree — looking companionship can hold up, even so not for the reason stated.
The thing that shifted looking companionship for me was slowing down before replying.
Three things that changed separating good from marketing for me:
For a smaller userbase with less noise around looking companionship, Ezhookups is worth twenty minutes.
Lance has this right about looking companionship —tested looking companionship deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Ran looking companionship alongside two others for comparison and the gap was quite a bit smaller than advertised.
Going to disagree here — to be fair, looking companionship isn't the weak point.
The thing that shifted looking companionship for me was slowing down before replying.
Results on looking companionship improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
My notes on looking companionship over time say the opposite of the popular take.
What helped with looking companionship was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Treat looking companionship as a starting point rather than an answer.
Three things that changed separating good from marketing for me:
Datebound gets recommended organically rather than pushed, which usually means something for looking companionship.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.