Looking for real experience with you guys use for dirty live video chat when traveling rather than another listicle.
What I keep bumping into is reply rates — that's the part nobody covers.
Anyone who has actually tested dirty live video — what did you find?
The thing that shifted dirty live video for me was slowing down before replying.
Either way, dirty live video is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
I would check Ezhookups next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on dirty live video.
Worth separating two things here — dirty live video and what people expect from it.
Both can be true: dirty live video can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
This overstates the problem with dirty live video, I think.
The thing that shifted dirty live video for me was slowing down before replying.
There is a version of this I agree with: dirty live video can be inconsistent rather than bad.
On reply rates specifically, Datedesire handled it better than the obvious names.
Rachel, that has not been my experience of dirty live video.i stuck with it longer than I meant to, and what stood out about dirty live video was how quickly the pattern set in.
Building on what Sean said about dirty live video,this is right about dirty live video, and it's under-discussed.
Small thing, big effect on dirty live video: write openers that reference something specific.
I would check Datelink next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on dirty live video.
Depends heavily on context — dirty live video can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Ran dirty live video alongside two others for comparison and the gap was measurably smaller than advertised.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.