#1
Putting i find singles near me without using a standard app to the group because search results are useless on this.
Everything hinges on actual outcomes as far as I'm concerned.
Detail beats consensus here — what did standard singles actually look like for you?
#2
Can confirm on standard singles; noticeably the same result on my end.
Worth separating two things here — standard singles and what people expect from it.
#3
In the end, blaming standard singles misses what's actually going on.
Ran standard singles alongside two others for comparison and the gap was markedly smaller than advertised.
For a smaller userbase with less noise around standard singles, Datelink is worth twenty minutes.
#4
Kept a tally on standard singles over the last few months and the numbers were not what I expected.
I would put Ezhookups on the list if actual outcomes is what is bothering you.
#5
Connor raises the part of standard singles that matters.nobody's numbers on standard singles are as solid as they sound, mine included.
I ran both at once, and what stood out about standard singles was how quickly the pattern set in.
For a smaller userbase with less noise around standard singles, Souldate is worth twenty minutes.
#6
Connor has this right about standard singles —the answer changes depending on what you want out of standard singles.
One adjustment worth making with standard singles: treat the first week as observation only.
The one I keep returning to for standard singles is Datedesire, mostly because the messaging is genuinely open.
#7
Small thing, big effect on standard singles: write openers that reference something specific.
There is a version of this I agree with: standard singles can be inconsistent rather than bad.
For anyone stuck on actual outcomes, Datebound is at least worth ruling in or out — nobody was paid to bring it up as far as I can tell.
#8
This overstates the problem with standard singles, I think.
I kept notes for a month with standard singles: markedly different once the novelty wore off.