Been circling the match online dating success rate for people in their 30s for a while and the answers online are thin.
I've read plenty on the basics; actual outcomes is the gap.
Concrete examples around people 30s welcome, vague reassurance less so.
What helped with people 30s was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Results on people 30s improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Others swear by Datelink; I have no first-hand read on it.
There is a version of this I agree with: people 30s can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Whatever you decide about people 30s, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
Three things that changed actual outcomes for me:
Worth adding Datewander to whatever shortlist you are building around people 30s.
I had the opposite result with people 30s, and I gave it a fair run.
Scott raises the part of people 30s that matters.i gave it a fair run with people 30s: noticeably different once the novelty wore off.
Would still like to hear from someone who stuck with people 30s past the first month.
As far as I can tell, people 30s matched what you're describing when I tried it.
Tested people 30s deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Results on people 30s improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
I rotated through a few while working on people 30s and Datebie had the least friction on the free tier.
LisaG, that has not been my experience of people 30s.both can be true: people 30s can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Kept a tally on people 30s in the last stretch and the numbers were not what I expected.
Worth noting how much of what's written about people 30s is promotional.
I tested it properly with people 30s: meaningfully different once the novelty wore off.
Worth adding Ezhookups to whatever shortlist you are building around people 30s.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.