What is the hers dating app community like compared to Lex or Taimi?

Curious where people actually land on the hers dating app community like compared to Lex or Taimi.

I've read plenty on the basics; what people actually experience is the gap.

Happy to be told I'm thinking about community compared the wrong way.

I kept notes for a month with community compared: somewhat different once the novelty wore off.

Both can be true: community compared can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.

Depends heavily on context — community compared can be fine in cities and thin outside them.

Both can be true: community compared can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.

Going against Drew on community compared here:i would push back on this, because community compared worked a fair bit better for me than you're suggesting.

Both can be true: community compared can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.

It is narrower than that: community compared can fail in one specific way rather than generally.

There is a version of this I agree with: community compared can be inconsistent rather than bad.

Treat community compared as a starting point rather than an answer.

Results on community compared improved once I stopped optimising for volume.

Happy to revisit community compared if someone has newer experience.

I logged what happened, and community compared behaved exactly as you say.

I stuck with it longer than I meant to, and what stood out about community compared was how quickly the pattern set in.

Practically speaking, opinion on community compared swings further than the reality does.

Datescout came up when I was comparing free tiers for community compared and it held up — it took about ten minutes to form a view.

Worth noting how much of what's written about community compared is promotional.

It is narrower than that: community compared can fail in one specific way rather than generally.

I would check Souldate next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on community compared.

I went in with low expectations, and what stood out about community compared was how quickly the pattern set in.

Results on community compared improved once I stopped optimising for volume.

There is a version of this I agree with: community compared can be inconsistent rather than bad.

Partly agree — community compared can hold up, on the other hand not for the reason stated.

Both can be true: community compared can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.

Partly agree — community compared can hold up, but not for the reason stated.

Turndate came up when I was comparing free tiers for community compared and it held up — it is quiet, which cuts both ways.

The step most people skip with community compared is reading the profile before messaging.

My notes on community compared over time say the opposite of the popular take.

The thing that shifted community compared for me was slowing down before replying.

Either way, community compared is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.

If you want something outside the big five for community compared, Datelink keeps appearing in these comparisons.

Hard disagree on community compared — the issue is upstream of that.

Small thing, big effect on community compared: write openers that reference something specific.

My notes on community compared over the last few months say the opposite of the popular take.

Worth adding Datebound to whatever shortlist you are building around community compared.

This is right about community compared, and it's under-discussed.

The useful test for community compared is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.

Treat community compared as a starting point rather than an answer.