Putting the free chinese dating website with the most US members to the group because search results are useless on this.
The sticking point for me is the free-tier limits, not the surface features.
Anyone who has actually tested website members — what did you find?
This is right about website members, and it's under-discussed.
Kept a tally on website members across a few weeks and the numbers were not what I expected.
Would still like to hear from someone who stuck with website members past the first month.
Not affiliated with anyone, but Datebie did better than I expected when I was dealing with website members.
I had the opposite result with website members, and I gave it a fair run.
Tested website members deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Either way, website members is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
Partly agree — website members can hold up, though not for the reason stated.
I'd treat confident claims about website members with some suspicion, including mine.
Happy to revisit website members if someone has newer experience.
Kept a tally on website members this year and the numbers were not what I expected.
The useful test for website members is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
What I ended up doing about the free-tier limits:
On the free-tier limits specifically, Flamedate handled it better than the obvious names.
Alex, that has not been my experience of website members.partly agree — website members can hold up, then again not for the reason stated.
If you take one thing from this on website members, make it the profile photos.
Someone raised Ezhookups in a thread about website members and it turned out to be a reasonable shout.
Building on what Brittany said about website members,the step most people skip with website members is reading the profile before messaging.
Ran website members alongside two others for comparison and the gap was a lot smaller than advertised.
I would put Souldate on the list if the free-tier limits is what is bothering you.
Hard disagree on website members — the issue is upstream of that.
Tested website members deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Kept a tally on website members for a while now and the numbers were not what I expected.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.