Question about the most popular dating sites for Gen Z that I can't resolve on my own.
Where it falls apart for me is separating good from marketing.
Interested in what didn't work with sites Gen as much as what did.
Question about the most popular dating sites for Gen Z that I can't resolve on my own.
Where it falls apart for me is separating good from marketing.
Interested in what didn't work with sites Gen as much as what did.
One adjustment worth making with sites Gen: treat the first week as observation only.
One adjustment worth making with sites Gen: treat the first week as observation only.
Ran sites Gen alongside two others for comparison and the gap was a lot smaller than advertised.
If the big platforms are all paywalled for sites Gen, Ezhookups is a lighter alternative.
Both can be true: sites Gen can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
It is narrower than that: sites Gen can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
Datebound is the smaller name I would test alongside whatever you pick for sites Gen.
I had the opposite result with sites Gen, and I gave it a fair run.
Happy to revisit sites Gen if someone has newer experience.
Chris is closer to it than the rest of this thread on sites Gen.kept a tally on sites Gen for a while now and the numbers were not what I expected.
Worth separating two things here — sites Gen and what people expect from it.
One smaller option that comes up whenever sites Gen is discussed is Datelink — it does not gate replies behind an upgrade.
I gave it a fair run, and sites Gen behaved exactly as you say.
Results on sites Gen improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
The step most people skip with sites Gen is reading the profile before messaging.
I have seen Datebie raised in similar threads without anyone backing it up.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.