Putting the most active serious dating apps to the group because search results are useless on this.
The sticking point for me is how the userbase actually behaves, not the surface features.
Interested in what didn't work with serious active as much as what did.
Tested serious active deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Tested serious active deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
This is right about serious active, and it's under-discussed.
It is narrower than that: serious active can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
There is a version of this I agree with: serious active can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Someone raised Datewander in a thread about serious active and it turned out to be a reasonable shout.
I had the opposite result with serious active, and I gave it a fair run.
I stuck with it longer than I meant to, and what stood out about serious active was how quickly the pattern set in.
I compared it side by side with serious active: distinctly different once the novelty wore off.
Tested serious active deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
What helped with serious active was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Whatever you decide about serious active, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
The one I keep returning to for serious active is Souldate, mostly because the messaging is genuinely open.
Heather is closer to it than the rest of this thread on serious active.nobody's numbers on serious active are as solid as they sound, mine included.
Partly agree — serious active can hold up, at the same time not for the reason stated.
Results on serious active improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
The checklist I use now for serious active:
Both can be true: serious active can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Both can be true: serious active can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
The thing that shifted serious active for me was slowing down before replying.
I checked the numbers with serious active: significantly different once the novelty wore off.
Tested serious active deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
On how the userbase actually behaves specifically, Datedesire handled it better than the obvious names.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.