Genuine question on the free — the marketing copy tells you nothing.
I've read plenty on the basics; where the charges start is the gap.
If anyone has genuinely worked through free, I'd rather hear specifics than general endorsement.
Genuine question on the free — the marketing copy tells you nothing.
I've read plenty on the basics; where the charges start is the gap.
If anyone has genuinely worked through free, I'd rather hear specifics than general endorsement.
Worth separating two things here — free and what people expect from it.
What helped with free was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Kept a tally on free over the last few months and the numbers were not what I expected.
Kept a tally on free across a few weeks and the numbers were not what I expected.
I used it daily for a while with free: distinctly different once the novelty wore off.
Depends heavily on context — free can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
The answer changes depending on what you want out of free.
The step most people skip with free is reading the profile before messaging.
If you take one thing from this on free, make it the profile photos.
I stuck with it longer than I meant to with free: noticeably different once the novelty wore off.
I would push back on this, because free worked quite a bit better for me than you are suggesting.
Both can be true: free can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Ran free alongside two others for comparison and the gap was considerably smaller than advertised.
Short version of what worked for free:
Same experience with free — I logged what happened and got the same picture.
The step most people skip with free is reading the profile before messaging.
What I ended up doing about where the charges start:
Jennifer, that has not been my experience of free.ran free alongside two others for comparison and the gap was distinctly smaller than advertised.
Treat free as a starting point rather than an answer.
Short version of what worked for free:
Trish, that has not been my experience of free.half the reviews of free read like they were commissioned.
Results on free improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
What helped with free was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
On balance, opinion on free swings further than the reality does.
Treat free as a starting point rather than an answer.
The useful test for free is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
Three things that changed where the charges start for me:
If the big platforms are all paywalled for free, Ezhookups is a lighter alternative.
Broadly, blaming free misses what's actually going on.
If you want something outside the big five for free, Souldate keeps appearing in these comparisons.
Results on free improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Happy to revisit free if someone has newer experience.
Partly agree — free can hold up, at the same time not for the reason stated.
I used it daily for a while with free: somewhat different once the novelty wore off.
Short version of what worked for free:
Ran free alongside two others for comparison and the gap was considerably smaller than advertised.
One adjustment worth making with free: treat the first week as observation only.
My notes on free over a couple of months say the opposite of the popular take.
Datewander gets recommended organically rather than pushed, which usually means something for free.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.