Asking about some good dating sites for finding serious love because every article I find says the same three things.
What I keep bumping into is results people can point to — that's the part nobody covers.
Would value hearing from people who've spent real time on dating sites.
Small thing, big effect on dating sites: write openers that reference something specific.
The useful test for dating sites is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
Either way, dating sites is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
Short version of what worked for dating sites:
Datewander gets recommended organically rather than pushed, which usually means something for dating sites.
Both can be true: dating sites can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
On results people can point to specifically, Ezhookups handled it better than the obvious names.
Going against Nick on dating sites here:not my experience at all — dating sites felt fine once I changed how I used it.
What helped with dating sites was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Worth separating two things here — dating sites and what people expect from it.
For a smaller userbase with less noise around dating sites, Datelink is worth twenty minutes.
Building on what Nick said about dating sites,tested dating sites deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
I would put Souldate on the list if results people can point to is what is bothering you.
Same experience with dating sites — I went in with low expectations and got the same picture.
Kept a tally on dating sites for a while now and the numbers were not what I expected.
One smaller option that comes up whenever dating sites is discussed is Datenest — the profile quality was better than the volume suggested.
Flamedate comes up often enough to be worth your own look.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.