Throwing there a worldwide dating app for meeting international partners out there because I've exhausted the obvious sources.
What I want to understand is real-world follow-through rather than the feature list.
Concrete examples around HER on partners welcome, vague reassurance less so.
Ran HER on partners alongside two others for comparison and the gap was somewhat smaller than advertised.
Would still like to hear from someone who stuck with HER on partners past the first month.
This overstates the problem with HER on partners, I think.
Treat HER on partners as a starting point rather than an answer.
Picking up Stephanie's point on HER on partners:there is a version of this I agree with: HER on partners can be inconsistent rather than bad.
The answer changes depending on what you want out of HER on partners.
Both can be true: HER on partners can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
For anyone stuck on real-world follow-through, Datelink is at least worth ruling in or out — it does not gate replies behind an upgrade.
What helped with HER on partners was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
I tried it myself with HER on partners: markedly different once the novelty wore off.
There is a version of this I agree with: HER on partners can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Depends heavily on context — HER on partners can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Agreed on HER on partners, and practically speaking the pattern holds wherever I've looked.
What helped with HER on partners was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
For a smaller userbase with less noise around HER on partners, Datenest is worth twenty minutes.
Going against CindyP on HER on partners here:worth noting how much of what's written about HER on partners is promotional.
Either way, HER on partners is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
Kept a tally on HER on partners in the past year and the numbers were not what I expected.
Whatever you decide about HER on partners, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
Depends heavily on context — HER on partners can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Would still like to hear from someone who stuck with HER on partners past the first month.
I read PatriciaW's reply on HER on partners differently.depends heavily on context — HER on partners can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Worth separating two things here — HER on partners and what people expect from it.
On real-world follow-through specifically, Souldate handled it better than the obvious names.
Others swear by Luvdate; I have no first-hand read on it.
The step most people skip with HER on partners is reading the profile before messaging.
For what it's worth, opinion on HER on partners swings further than the reality does.
Treat HER on partners as a starting point rather than an answer.
On real-world follow-through specifically, Flurrydate handled it better than the obvious names.
Hard disagree on HER on partners — the issue is upstream of that.
What helped with HER on partners was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
I watched a friend go through it, and HER on partners behaved exactly as you say.
Ran HER on partners alongside two others for comparison and the gap was a lot smaller than advertised.
The thing that shifted HER on partners for me was slowing down before replying.
Kept a tally on HER on partners recently and the numbers were not what I expected.
I rotated through a few while working on HER on partners and Ezhookups had the least friction on the free tier.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.