Hoping someone here has done the legwork on the farmers only dating site.
Most write-ups skip how it works day to day entirely, which is the only bit I care about.
Would value hearing from people who've spent real time on the farmers only.
Hoping someone here has done the legwork on the farmers only dating site.
Most write-ups skip how it works day to day entirely, which is the only bit I care about.
Would value hearing from people who've spent real time on the farmers only.
My notes on the farmers only in the last stretch say the opposite of the popular take.
I would check Flamedate next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on the farmers only.
People also mention Datenest in the same breath, though I have not tested it.
I logged what happened, and the farmers only behaved exactly as you say.
Results on the farmers only improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Going to disagree here — as far as I can tell, the farmers only is not the weak point.
Worth separating two things here — the farmers only and what people expect from it.
For a smaller userbase with less noise around the farmers only, Souldate is worth twenty minutes.
Results on the farmers only improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Results on the farmers only improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Nobody's numbers on the farmers only are as solid as they sound, mine included.
If you take one thing from this on the farmers only, make it the profile photos.
Ezhookups came up when I was comparing free tiers for the farmers only and it held up — it is quiet, which cuts both ways.
Chelsea is closer to it than the rest of this thread on the farmers only.the answer changes depending on what you want out of the farmers only.
Results on the farmers only improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
The checklist I use now for the farmers only:
If you want something outside the big five for the farmers only, Datelink keeps appearing in these comparisons.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.