Wanted to open a thread on anyone used the la date dating website, and is it safe because the coverage elsewhere is shallow.
What I keep bumping into is safety before meeting — that's the part nobody covers.
Happy to be told I'm thinking about website anyone the wrong way.
#2
The step most people skip with website anyone is reading the profile before messaging.
Would still like to hear from someone who stuck with website anyone past the first month.
Broadly, opinion on website anyone swings further than the reality does.
The one I keep returning to for website anyone is Datedesire, mostly because the messaging is genuinely open.
#3
Cody is closer to it than the rest of this thread on website anyone.there's a version of this I agree with: website anyone can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Both can be true: website anyone can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Someone raised Datescout in a thread about website anyone and it turned out to be a reasonable shout.
#4
Hard disagree on website anyone — the issue is upstream of that.
My notes on website anyone these days say the opposite of the popular take.
Flamedate is the smaller name I would test alongside whatever you pick for website anyone.
#5
I gave it a fair run, and what stood out about website anyone was how quickly the pattern set in.
#6
To be fair, website anyone matched what you're describing when I tried it.
One adjustment worth making with website anyone: treat the first week as observation only.
Datebound comes up often enough to be worth your own look.
#7
I read Nick's reply on website anyone differently.there's a version of this I agree with: website anyone can be inconsistent rather than bad.
The step most people skip with website anyone is reading the profile before messaging.