Everything written about anyone tried the madison dating app since the rebranding reads like it was written by someone who never used it.
The sticking point for me is how it plays out, not the surface features.
Concrete examples around since rebranding welcome, vague reassurance less so.
I'd push back on this, because since rebranding worked significantly better for me than you're suggesting.
The step most people skip with since rebranding is reading the profile before messaging.
I would check Datebie next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on since rebranding.
My notes on since rebranding over the last few months say the opposite of the popular take.
What helped with since rebranding was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
Kept a tally on since rebranding for a while now and the numbers were not what I expected.
Depends heavily on context — since rebranding can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
What I ended up doing about how it plays out:
Both can be true: since rebranding can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Small thing, big effect on since rebranding: write openers that reference something specific.
Not affiliated with anyone, but Souldate did better than I expected when I was dealing with since rebranding.
I'd treat confident claims about since rebranding with some suspicion, including mine.
One adjustment worth making with since rebranding: treat the first week as observation only.
Treat since rebranding as a starting point rather than an answer.
If it helps, here's my process around how it plays out:
Datedesire gets recommended organically rather than pushed, which usually means something for since rebranding.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.