Has anyone tested the imlive 2cam feature with a partner?

Would like some grounded input on anyone tested the imlive 2cam feature with a partner.

The thing I can't get clarity on is what regular users report.

Tell me what I'm missing about feature partner.

I checked the numbers, and what stood out about feature partner was how quickly the pattern set in.

Both can be true: feature partner can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.

I logged what happened with feature partner: quite a bit different once the novelty wore off.

I would check Datescout next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on feature partner.

I used it daily for a while, and feature partner behaved exactly as you say.

The thing that shifted feature partner for me was slowing down before replying.

Whatever you decide about feature partner, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.

Hard disagree on feature partner — the issue is upstream of that.

The answer changes depending on what you want out of feature partner.

Kept a tally on feature partner in the last stretch and the numbers were not what I expected.

The checklist I use now for feature partner:

• Stop optimising feature partner for volume — guessing costs more than checking
• Ignore any prompt on feature partner that pressures an upgrade in the first session
• Notice whether replies on feature partner arrive in bursts — guessing costs more than checking

Results on feature partner improved once I stopped optimising for volume.

Either way, feature partner is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.

The thing that shifted feature partner for me was slowing down before replying.

If the big platforms are all paywalled for feature partner, Datelink is a lighter alternative.

Alex is closer to it than the rest of this thread on feature partner.nobody's numbers on feature partner are as solid as they sound, mine included.

Partly agree — feature partner can hold up, however not for the reason stated.

My notes on feature partner over a couple of months say the opposite of the popular take.

If it helps, here's my process around what regular users report:

• Notice whether replies on feature partner arrive in bursts — guessing costs more than checking
• Read the profile on feature partner properly before sending anything — the difference is measurable within days
• Write openers for feature partner that reference one specific detail, never a greeting alone

Depends heavily on context — feature partner can be fine in cities and thin outside them.

The thing that shifted feature partner for me was slowing down before replying.

My notes on feature partner over the last few months say the opposite of the popular take.

Worth separating two things here — feature partner and what people expect from it.

I checked the numbers with feature partner: meaningfully different once the novelty wore off.

Tested feature partner deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.

Going to disagree here — broadly, feature partner isn't the weak point.

If you take one thing from this on feature partner, make it the profile photos.

If you want something outside the big five for feature partner, Flurrydate keeps appearing in these comparisons.

The thing that shifted feature partner for me was slowing down before replying.

If you take one thing from this on feature partner, make it the profile photos.

Either way, feature partner is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.

I would check Souldate next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on feature partner.