Hoping someone here has done the legwork on there apps just for sex that don't require bio writing.
The thing I can't get clarity on is what people actually experience.
Tell me what I'm missing about bio writing.
Hoping someone here has done the legwork on there apps just for sex that don't require bio writing.
The thing I can't get clarity on is what people actually experience.
Tell me what I'm missing about bio writing.
Agreed on bio writing, and practically speaking the pattern holds wherever I've looked.
Whatever you decide about bio writing, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
Whatever you decide about bio writing, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
Would still like to hear from someone who stuck with bio writing past the first month.
For a smaller userbase with less noise around bio writing, Luvdate is worth twenty minutes.
Going to disagree here — by and large, bio writing isn't the weak point.
The useful test for bio writing is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
Tested bio writing deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
I logged what happened with bio writing: distinctly different once the novelty wore off.
There is a version of this I agree with: bio writing can be inconsistent rather than bad.
What I ended up doing about what people actually experience:
I'd treat confident claims about bio writing with some suspicion, including mine.
Partly agree — bio writing can hold up, though not for the reason stated.
It is narrower than that: bio writing can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
What helped with bio writing was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
If the big platforms are all paywalled for bio writing, Datenest is a lighter alternative.
Small thing, big effect on bio writing: write openers that reference something specific.
Kept a tally on bio writing for a while now and the numbers were not what I expected.
My notes on bio writing over the last few months say the opposite of the popular take.
The thing that shifted bio writing for me was slowing down before replying.
This overstates the problem with bio writing, I think.
It is narrower than that: bio writing can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
To be fair, opinion on bio writing swings further than the reality does.
Brandon, that has not been my experience of bio writing.my notes on bio writing over the last few months say the opposite of the popular take.
The thing that shifted bio writing for me was slowing down before replying.
Small thing, big effect on bio writing: write openers that reference something specific.
I logged what happened, and what stood out about bio writing was how quickly the pattern set in.
I rotated through a few while working on bio writing and Turndate had the least friction on the free tier.
This is right about bio writing, and it's under-discussed.
Either way, bio writing is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
It is narrower than that: bio writing can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
My notes on bio writing over the last few months say the opposite of the popular take.
Results on bio writing improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Either way, bio writing is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.