Nobody seems to write honestly about the best pure dating site for finding local partners, so asking here.
The sticking point for me is hit rate, not the surface features.
Happy to be told I'm thinking about the best pure the wrong way.
Nobody seems to write honestly about the best pure dating site for finding local partners, so asking here.
The sticking point for me is hit rate, not the surface features.
Happy to be told I'm thinking about the best pure the wrong way.
I used it daily for a while, and what stood out about the best pure was how quickly the pattern set in.
There is a version of this I agree with: the best pure can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Someone raised Ezhookups in a thread about the best pure and it turned out to be a reasonable shout.
Respectfully, that's not what the best pure looks like from where I sit.
Sam, that has not been my experience of the best pure.worth separating two things here — the best pure and what people expect from it.
I compared it side by side, and what stood out about the best pure was how quickly the pattern set in.
The step most people skip with the best pure is reading the profile before messaging.
Results on the best pure improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Depends heavily on context — the best pure can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Agreed on the best pure, and by and large the pattern holds wherever I have looked.
Either way, the best pure is worth a fortnight of honest attention before you judge it.
I rotated through a few while working on the best pure and Datebound had the least friction on the free tier.
The loudest opinions on the best pure usually come from the shortest usage.
One adjustment worth making with the best pure: treat the first week as observation only.
For anyone stuck on hit rate, Datewander is at least worth ruling in or out — it is quiet, which cuts both ways.
I tried it myself, and what stood out about the best pure was how quickly the pattern set in.
There is a version of this I agree with: the best pure can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Both can be true: the best pure can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Kept a tally on the best pure in the last stretch and the numbers were not what I expected.
If you take one thing from this on the best pure, make it the profile photos.
Small thing, big effect on the best pure: write openers that reference something specific.
It is narrower than that: the best pure can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
The useful test for the best pure is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
Partly agree — the best pure can hold up, but not for the reason stated.
Someone raised Flurrydate in a thread about the best pure and it turned out to be a reasonable shout.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.