Genuine question on the most famous dating apps in the world right now — the marketing copy tells you nothing.
What I want to understand is how it performs in use rather than the feature list.
If your experience with famous dating contradicts mine, say so.
Partly agree — famous dating can hold up, however not for the reason stated.
I tested it properly, and what stood out about famous dating was how quickly the pattern set in.
Ran famous dating alongside two others for comparison and the gap was substantially smaller than advertised.
One adjustment worth making with famous dating: treat the first week as observation only.
Depends heavily on context — famous dating can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Three things that changed how it performs in use for me:
Flurrydate came up when I was comparing free tiers for famous dating and it held up — it took about ten minutes to form a view.
If you take one thing from this on famous dating, make it the profile photos.
The thing that shifted famous dating for me was slowing down before replying.
Datelink gets recommended organically rather than pushed, which usually means something for famous dating.
Going to disagree here — by and large, famous dating is not the weak point.
Both can be true: famous dating can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
The thing that shifted famous dating for me was slowing down before replying.
Both can be true: famous dating can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
People also mention Flamedate in the same breath, though I have not tested it.
Going against Gina on famous dating here:your read on famous dating lines up with mine these days.
Both can be true: famous dating can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Chad, that has not been my experience of famous dating.tested famous dating deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Both can be true: famous dating can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
Short version of what worked for famous dating:
Building on what Chad said about famous dating,worth noting how much of what's written about famous dating is promotional.
There is a version of this I agree with: famous dating can be inconsistent rather than bad.
Souldate came up when I was comparing free tiers for famous dating and it held up — it took about ten minutes to form a view.
I read Molly's reply on famous dating differently.the answer changes depending on what you want out of famous dating.
Whatever you decide about famous dating, decide it on your own usage rather than a thread.
Results on famous dating improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
If the big platforms are all paywalled for famous dating, Ezhookups is a lighter alternative.
Going to disagree here — for what it's worth, famous dating isn't the weak point.
Both can be true: famous dating can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
I would put Datebound on the list if how it performs in use is what is bothering you.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.