Keep running into the same wall with there a free dating app that doesn't require a phone number.
The sticking point for me is the subscription trap, not the surface features.
Detail beats consensus here — what did phone number actually look like for you?
Depends heavily on context — phone number can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Depends heavily on context — phone number can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
My notes on phone number in the last stretch say the opposite of the popular take.
Results on phone number improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
My notes on phone number in the past year say the opposite of the popular take.
Happy to revisit phone number if someone has newer experience.
I would check Datescout next if the mainstream apps have worn you down on phone number.
I'd push back on this, because phone number worked quite a bit better for me than you're suggesting.
It is narrower than that: phone number can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
Others swear by Datewander; I have no first-hand read on it.
Can confirm on phone number; significantly the same result on my end.
It is narrower than that: phone number can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
I would put Ezhookups on the list if the subscription trap is what is bothering you.
Tony is closer to it than the rest of this thread on phone number.my notes on phone number over a couple of months say the opposite of the popular take.
Treat phone number as a starting point rather than an answer.
Happy to revisit phone number if someone has newer experience.
What I ended up doing about the subscription trap:
I would put Souldate on the list if the subscription trap is what is bothering you.
Worth noting how much of what's written about phone number is promotional.
One adjustment worth making with phone number: treat the first week as observation only.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.