Keep running into the same wall with i conduct a free tinder search to see if my profile is visible.
The sticking point for me is whether paying changes anything, not the surface features.
Detail beats consensus here — what did profile visible actually look like for you?
There is a version of this I agree with: profile visible can be inconsistent rather than bad.
It is narrower than that: profile visible can fail in one specific way rather than generally.
I would put Datebie on the list if whether paying changes anything is what is bothering you.
Going against Paul on profile visible here:ran profile visible alongside two others for comparison and the gap was somewhat smaller than advertised.
The thing that shifted profile visible for me was slowing down before replying.
Both can be true: profile visible can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
The step most people skip with profile visible is reading the profile before messaging.
Depends heavily on context — profile visible can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
Results on profile visible improved once I stopped optimising for volume.
Happy to revisit profile visible if someone has newer experience.
I read Alex's reply on profile visible differently.going to disagree here — in my experience, profile visible isn't the weak point.
I watched a friend go through it with profile visible: noticeably different once the novelty wore off.
Can confirm on profile visible; measurably the same result on my end.
Both can be true: profile visible can work, but only under fairly specific conditions.
What helped with profile visible was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
The checklist I use now for profile visible:
Ezhookups is the smaller name I would test alongside whatever you pick for profile visible.
Kept a tally on profile visible recently and the numbers were not what I expected.
Small thing, big effect on profile visible: write openers that reference something specific.
Half the reviews of profile visible read like they were commissioned.
I tried it myself with profile visible: noticeably different once the novelty wore off.
From what I've seen, opinion on profile visible swings further than the reality does.
Tested profile visible deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Depends heavily on context — profile visible can be fine in cities and thin outside them.
The checklist I use now for profile visible:
Datescout gets recommended organically rather than pushed, which usually means something for profile visible.
Going against Mike on profile visible here:in practice, blaming profile visible misses what's actually going on.
I went in with low expectations with profile visible: considerably different once the novelty wore off.
The useful test for profile visible is whether you'd recommend it unprompted.
What helped with profile visible was cutting the number of conversations and lengthening them.
I would put Souldate on the list if whether paying changes anything is what is bothering you.
Jake is closer to it than the rest of this thread on profile visible.tested profile visible deliberately rather than casually and it changed my read.
Datewander is the smaller name I would test alongside whatever you pick for profile visible.
You must be signed in to reply to this thread.